Friday, August 2, 2019

The latest Ken Henry blow-up

Warren Buffett - quite regularly at his annual meetings - observes that almost 400 thousand people work at Berkshire - in other words a medium sized city.

In those 400 thousand people (as in any medium sized city) there are almost certainly people doing things that they should not and things that you would not want to see on the front page of the local paper. They are selling products that rip off customers, they are doing things that threaten the reputation of Berkshire.

It is unreasonable in any large company to expect that there is no corporate mischief, no customers that are being misled, no staff doing things that are wrong.

But you can expect the management to monitor staff behaviour and to create incentives to do the right thing and to appropriately deal with staff that do the wrong thing. You should also expect them to compensate customers who fall victim and that compensation should be expensive.

Warren Buffett will also endlessly talk about the things he is doing to ensure that integrity is what is rewarded at Berkshire.

The Sydney Morning Herald today led with a headline that in leaked letters to consultants Dr Ken Henry (then Chair of National Australia Bank) had said that bad things were being done - even as they spoke - at National Australia Bank. To quote:

[Dr Henry is] confident that there are products currently being sold now that they will need to remediate in the future ([and he] highlighted an example of SMSF borrowing to invest in managed funds).
This looks pretty like the thing that Warren Buffett said about Berkshire. And it was said - as the context makes clear - to have the consultants who were hired to help in remediating the matter. In other words the admission is what is required to fix the problem.

A while ago I went to look at the lending practices of the Australian banks and I am confident that all four big banks had bad processes, and ripped off customers. As I have stated elsewhere I think that National Australia was the least bad of a bad lot. But it clearly had things to fix.

I still think NAB has things to fix. So does Westpac, CBA and ANZ [in that order I believe]. Stating it and acting on it is a necessary part of the process.

That Ken Henry actually stated it and presumably to a consultant he had hired to help reflects well, not poorly on him.


PS. I also think alas that Dr Henry is right. The mis-selling scandals cost British banks billions of pounds. PPI mis-selling alone was above 20 billion pounds. There has been so much mischief at Australian banks that this issue is certain to bite them in the future. Dr Henry clearly identified the issue and wanted to do something about it. He should be applauded.


TomTom said...

You need to put it in context. The issue is his evasiveness and lack of transparancy at the RC. CBA had done much worse to their customers but the CEO and Chairman were more transparent and owned up to it more.

Henry instead decided to disrespect the process and lecture everyone.

Even he recognised it was a mistake, later saying “I really should have performed quite differently. I should have been much more open."

Wally said...

Ken Henry should never have been pushed / jumped from NAB. His comments at the RC were entirely sensible. However the RC was never about finding out about business practices, bad or otherwise. It was a Spanish Inquisition, looking to find some people to put to death. It did that very well. Finding the RIGHT people to put to death... another matter entirely.

Of course we can expect stupid and lazy journalists to turn all this into another way to beat some more out of Dr Henry.

Seems to me he's one of the few with integrity.

I have a simple way for the Australian bankers to get back the trust of the public:

1. No more bonuses for anyone. Fixed salary. Don't like it, go to some overseas bank.

2. Modest fixed salary. I'd prefer $1 per year but I suppose the bankers need to live off something, so how about $50K per year.

Just imagine it: Australia, lank of the $50K bankers.

There would be little incentive to behave badly when modestly paid on a fixed salary.

James B. Shearer said...

"... So does Westpac, CBA and ANZ [in that order I believe]. ..."

What order? Most things to fix to least or least to most?

emthree said...

Enjoyed listening to this podcast where you discuss your mentor Ken Henry;

Anonymous said...

I was on a jury for a rape trial. They gave us print outs of the text messages between the accused guy and the alleged victim. It was a stack of almost 100 pages of the most cringeworthy drivel I had ever seen. Endless chit about how beautiful and amazing she was and chit. Then the bish goes up there on the stand and claims she never realized he was interested in her romantically and thought he was just a friend. what in the fuk.

Anonymous said...

Interesting, but:), John what about Bayer?

Isn't now the right time?


General disclaimer

The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of Mr. Hempton. You should assume Mr. Hempton and his affiliates have positions in the securities discussed in this blog, and such beneficial ownership can create a conflict of interest regarding the objectivity of this blog. Statements in the blog are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors. Certain information in this blog concerning economic trends and performance is based on or derived from information provided by third-party sources. Mr. Hempton does not guarantee the accuracy of such information and has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information or the assumptions on which such information is based. Such information may change after it is posted and Mr. Hempton is not obligated to, and may not, update it. The commentary in this blog in no way constitutes a solicitation of business, an offer of a security or a solicitation to purchase a security, or investment advice. In fact, it should not be relied upon in making investment decisions, ever. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. In particular this blog is not directed for investment purposes at US Persons.