Thursday, February 19, 2009
Do they read in Washington?
The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of Mr. Hempton. You should assume Mr. Hempton and his affiliates have positions in the securities discussed in this blog, and such beneficial ownership can create a conflict of interest regarding the objectivity of this blog. Statements in the blog are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors. Certain information in this blog concerning economic trends and performance is based on or derived from information provided by third-party sources. Mr. Hempton does not guarantee the accuracy of such information and has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information or the assumptions on which such information is based. Such information may change after it is posted and Mr. Hempton is not obligated to, and may not, update it. The commentary in this blog in no way constitutes a solicitation of business, an offer of a security or a solicitation to purchase a security, or investment advice. In fact, it should not be relied upon in making investment decisions, ever. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. In particular this blog is not directed for investment purposes at US Persons.
John-- some of us read your posts in their entirety in Google Reader (or similar services) so a 2.5 min visit does mean the article was not read in its entirety.
BTW I read 300-400 articles and 1,200+ headlines a day from 200+ feeds, and I find yours some of the most thoughtful, cognitive value-added pieces. Particularly because you present qualitatively new angles, and you have proven to be prescient on many current issues (i.e. the Baltics).
John - Remember, that's an average. The distribution is slanted by early leavers. Also, a lot of folks just copy and paste into a word doc.
- Eddy (in Adams Morgan)
Yes, google reader.
I use that as well, read all your posts but doubt it is captured on google analytics at all.
average time on site doesn't mean anything -- if they download it and read it and don't click anything else on the site that will just count the download.
i understood the post and most of the comments but i didn't understand david pearson's comment -- could someone help me out here?
I just use a tab to open an article and keep going to other sites. Don't know if that gets measured properly. Don't trust the numbers.
There's an option somewhere in your Blogger conrol panel that has newsreaders only post the first couple of lines of a piece. That makes them go to your site. You're providing the content and you should get the hits.
Second on what Nick said. I read every day nit through Google Reader so the average view stats might be a bit out of whack.
Keep up the great work!
I have to admit that I'm a long time reader from up here all the way in Canada, but most of the time simply read through Bloglines.
Just thought I'd chime in and offer my kudos to the succinct insight you offer.
I printed your article out. Reading long pieces on the computer hurts my eyes.
Maybe it's a tale of two cities. There are certainly plenty of Manhattanites with lots of time on their hands suddenly. On the flip side, maybe we should be encouraged that the Washintonians are busy and forced to cram. In any case, great post; thanks for the insights.
I downloaded the long post to my mobile device and then shut down the connection. I'll bet you have lotsa D.C. readers with Smartphones.
Post a Comment