Monday, January 3, 2011
The party is not over in Australia
He is dead right that the Australian economy is a party and that it will end.
He is wrong that it is over now. The property market is more illiquid than usual. It has got illiquid a few times (and essentially flat) and every time it has I have thought that we were in Wile-E-Coyote country. (You know the type - the Coyote has run off the cliff - but he has not looked down - and only when he looks he starts to fall.) It just never fell.
The beaches are crowded and people are still buying lots of $6 ice-cream cones. You still meet plenty of people who are purchasing houses for more than can afford whilst driving his-and-hers BMWs.
I have thought the party was going to end for a while. (Like Mike Shedlock I am wanting to run fast from this bubble.) But early is wrong.
I have done very nicely with my offshore money. I have managed to keep up with the Australian dollar and then some. For that I am thankful. It would have course been easier to just buy Aussie bonds.
Oh well...
Friday, December 17, 2010
Looming excess capacity in getting you smashed and Chinese statistics
We hired locals to show us what they did for fun - which largely revolved around cock-fighting and any other form of gambling they could find and moonshine. They even bred fighting fish for gambling.
I sipped (small amounts of) moonshine and watched Cambodian soldiers play poker and boules.* The soldiers left their machine guns in a pile whilst they gambled. They would not let me photograph them because they were on duty. (They had machine guns - so I went along with that request.)
The moonshine was bad. Really bad. Kill-people sort-of-bad. Drinking it in quantity would be like having your brain smashed around a gold brick and then twirled with some slightly rotten pineapple chunks. It told me that the real game in alcohol in developing countries is to get people off the (literally) poisonous once-distilled moonshine and get them onto double or triple distilled stuff that comes in bottles. The biggest selling liquor label in the world used to be Johnny Walker Red Label. Now it’s Bagpiper - a genuine Indian whiskey. Bagpiper is one of the few liquors I would argue saves lives. The alternative is moonshine and with regular and sometimes very large death-tolls.
In China they didn’t take to whiskey like the Indians. Instead they drink Baijiu. The alcohol is usually sold as a wholesale ingredient - and blended under lots of brand names. The commercially made (and multiple distilled) grain alcohols will be displacing moonshine for years to come. There is good quality growth there.
Which brings me to China New Borun (BORN). BORN is a controversial stock floated on the US exchange earlier this year. It had reputable brokers backing the IPO. [The prospectus is part of my holiday reading!]
The prospectus tells us that edible alcohol is sold by grade (A, B, C) with A grade being more refined and hence tasting better. This company produces B and C grade with increasing focus on the B grade. Absolut Vodka it is not - but whatever - it is likely far better than the vat of rice and rotten pineapple by the Tonle Sap I tried. Here is what the company says about its production.
We currently own and operate two facilities: one in Shouguang, Shandong Province and the other in Daqing, Heilongjiang Province. Our Shouguang facility has an annual production capacity of 160,000 tons of corn−based edible alcohol (90,000 tons of Grade B edible alcohol and 70,000 tons of Grade C edible alcohol). Our Daqing facility currently has an annual production capacity of 100,000 tons of corn−based edible alcohol (70,000 tons of Grade B edible alcohol and 30,000 tons Grade C edible alcohol). We are constructing an additional 120,000 tons of capacity (all Grade B edible alcohol) at our Daqing facility, currently expected to commence commercial production in December 2010. According to the Frost & Sullivan Report, we are the largest privately−owned corn−based edible alcohol producer operating in Shandong Province and Heilongjiang Province. Our Daqing facility is licensed to build up to 330,000 tons of production capacity of edible alcohol. Based on data from the Frost & Sullivan Report and our knowledge of our industry, we believe we will be the largest producer of corn−based edible alcohol in China, in terms of current known production capacity, following complete development of the Daqing facility.
In China the numbers can bamboozle you - but I am not used to talking about 380 thousand tons of edible alcohol. That will supply an awful lot of drunks. I was trying to work out just how many - but the text of the prospectus does not make clear whether they are talking about metric tonnes or US short tons** as would be measured in America. (The spelling is different - so I would normally go with the spelling - except that China would measure this in metric and some diagrams later in the prospectus are specifically labelled as “metric tons”.)
And here is the diagram that was labelled “metric tons”. It purports to show edible alcohol consumption in China. They mean grain based stuff sold into the Baijiu market.
Lets take the 2012 estimate. 7.3 million tonnes of alcohol per annum. That is 7.3 billion kilograms of alcohol per annum. That is of course on top of the moonshine, wines, beers and imported spirits that the Chinese drink. (The growth in this chart must be moonshine replacement.) This is a lot of alcohol even for 1.3 billion people. It is more alcohol than the Chinese drink according to WHO statistics. Indeed it suggests that the Chinese are as drunk as the Russians (something that casual observation of culture makes you think is unlikely).
There is just over a quarter of a kilogram of alcohol in a (standard 700ml) bottle of Absolut Vodka. So this represents say 29 billion bottles of vodka. One company - China New Borun - is - according to its prospectus - responsible for about 1.2 billion of these bottles.
By contrast, the biggest selling liquor labels in the world (Bagpiper, Johnny Walker Red) sell about 20 million bottles (ahem: cases) each. China New Borun claims to be an absolute global behemoth in the business of getting people smashed. (Even with the bottles-cases correction China New Borun is a global behemoth in getting people stewed.)
Of course all the consumption in this note - and China New Borun's capacity - represent 2012 estimates. Maybe - like everything else in the world - the Chinese are building excess capacity in getting people pissed, legless, bladdered, trashed and otherwise off-the-wagon.
Lesson of all this: there are either a lot of drunks in China or the statistics are wrong. Maybe there are a lot of drunks in China and the statistics are wrong. Maybe the statistics are compiled by the drunks. Maybe the excess alcohol capacity is supplied by drunks. Whatever - when it comes to statistics and China you need to take them with a good stiff glass of Baijiu. If the statistics are in a prospectus trying to sell you stock - take two glasses of Baijiu. If that does not work - resort to moonshine.
John
*The French left baguettes, boules and train-tracks. The train-tracks have since been converted to bamboo railways.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Fish and chips in Kiama
I write to make an observation – one for all the currency speculators out there. We stopped for a meal on the way South. South of Sydney (hence with cooler water) is the unfashionable part of the New South Wales coast. A beach-town cafe in decidedly middle class Kiama – and without water views is now as expensive as a cafe on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. (The fish and chips are better in Kiama though.)
Some of this price level is due to wage structure – but most of it is new. Australia is just expensive and getting more so – and the Central Bank (justifiably) feels the need to raise interest rates. Australia is now a very expensive place to visit and I do not recommend it except for the very wealthy.
It's hard to call the end of the Australian bubble – but the boom and prices have gone far beyond rational. I don't see what breaks it other than an end to the Chinese construction boom. These prices are the downside of being China's coal and iron ore mine. In America I saw no obvious inflation between trips. On the South Coast of New South Wales I can't say the same thing.
If you are an Australian and you are not in the process of shifting 25 percent of your asset base offshore you are probably remiss. And if you are a currency speculator liking the carry on Australian government bonds then it has been a great trade but I hope you get to the exits early.
Meanwhile you can enjoy ordinary ice-cream cones in small coastal towns at US $5.30 each.
John
*There is a blog post in that internet company – but it will have to wait for the new year. I want to talk to management to hear their side of the story first.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Shawn Richard of Astarra enters a guilty plea
The regulator closed Astarra within a month. I have no complaints.
I wrote up part of my thinking for this blog.
But until recently no charges were laid and I was getting increasingly frustrated. I even wrote a (slightly) complaining letter to ASIC (the Australian regulator) only yesterday.
But the Australian regulator rocks! Shawn Richard (the principal malefactor) was charged - entered a guilty plea and will go to prison (probably for five years).
I want to acknowledge the press. The Sydney Morning Herald has kept the story alive with accurate and hard-hitting reporting. The (financial) decline of newspapers is not a good thing.
ASIC has set a standard for the SEC to emulate.
Prosecutions are important. Many thousands of people have lost their life savings in this mess. A strong regulatory response will reduce the chance of repeat problems.
John
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Laundry lessons - a first follow up
And it did that even though I was careful to point out some of the many benefits of a wide income distribution. There are benefits of non-strict labor laws which make certain businesses possible in America that are very difficult in Europe or Australia.
We have a friend who has a massively cyclic business. (The business involves capital equipment for the construction industry.) They pay their staff very well. (Many receive $100 per hour though most receive far less.) However their staff numbers shrink by 80 plus percent whenever business turns down (regularly enough) and rise by 500 percent when business turns up. The volatility in the business is shared with the staff rather than being absorbed entirely by the owner.
In extrema this business could not exist in (say) France because no business owner could (or would) absorb this volatility themselves. The owner openly says he does not know how people do business in France. Sharing the pain works.
This applies across the whole labor market - the highly flexible working conditions of America are a strength of American business even though at times they result in amazingly large income variability and some very low wages.
Still - and carefully thinking about it - I am not sure what the real cause of low-end wages is.
Many readers thought (logically enough) that immigration levels drove bottom-end wages - after all the women washing my clothes were Chinese and the nannies were largely Hispanic. Some on Business Insider thought me an idiot for not just accepting that. (Australia is - they observed - becoming more closed to immigration.)
I am not so sure.
The US population is 307 million and it grows about 1 million per annum - most of which is driven by immigration - some of it illegal.
Australia has a population of 21.9 million - and the immigration rate has been over 200 thousand people per annum of late. (Its about to drop for political reasons.) The population growth rate in Australia is three times the USA - almost entirely driven by immigration including a lot of immigration of people who would expect to earn below average wages.
In Australia there are more immigrants to do my laundry per head of population than in the USA.
And yet bottom end wages have never been quite as pressured as in the USA - and frankly - I do not understand why.
This is interesting in the case of Australia but truly important for Europe. Europe opened itself to massive internal immigration from poor countries and did not have a collapse in the bottom end wage structure.
The GDP per capita in Bulgaria is under $7000 USD per annum. Bulgaria is poorer than Mexico on that measure. And the border is open. Romania is similar (with a larger population). And sure the low wage workers who clean my hotel room in London are likely to be Bulgarian or Romanian but - whatever - they haven’t managed to drive down the price of laundry.
And that I do not quite understand. It is making writing the European follow up post difficult.
John
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Lessons in my laundry - part 1
Anyway I stayed with some friends who turned out (somewhat to my surprise) to be more prosperous than I imagined. They lived in a three level beautiful inner Chicago house designed by a very stylish architect. I was there getting over jet-lag and cooking in their beautiful kitchen. (I cooked braised pork with sage, shallots, and star anise.)
I also did my laundry. Much to my surprise my hosts did not have an ironing board.
I told my wife by phone - and she thought they must be absurdly wealthy - but then even the wealthy in Australia have an ironing board. Sure they were a highly motivated and extremely hard working professional couple and ironing was hardly a priority - but it was still strange.
And then in Brooklyn - a week later - I worked it out. I dropped my laundry off at a Chinese Laundromat and got back a few pressed shirts, my jeans, socks etcetera and paid $11.75. I figure the same basket would cost me $28 in Australia. Why would you bother to wash and iron if you were prosperous and laundry was that cheap... moreover there was at least two laundries between my home and the subway. I did not need to go out of my way.
This was all because of something I knew on paper - but the price of washing made it personal. Australia does not have large numbers of very low wage employees and - even in the days machines - laundry is a labor intensive and non-traded commodity. Laundry is expensive in Australia because the person doing it expects to make $15 plus per hour. Sure minimum wages are a little lower than that - but most lowly skilled workers are paid more than the minimum. The laundries I pass in Brooklyn take the clothes to a large warehouse-type room filled with Chinese women who speak little English and who almost certainly work for less than minimum wages. And a upper middle-class New Yorker either never sees them and can ignore them. A large low-wage group make the (very rich) lifestyles of the American elite possible. They make it possible to never do your washing, eat in up-market restaurants, have nannies look after your children and have a material standard of living that even very rich Australians might envy.
If you are minimum wage worker and you have a job it is clearly much better if you live in Sydney or Melbourne than Brooklyn. At the moment of course Australia is the far-better bet - low wage workers are more likely to find a job down-under and the job is certain to pay better. But that is not the pattern of the last twenty years. Mostly Australia has run unemployment a percent or more higher than the United States and there has been less low-pay work. (Of course the reason why there is less low pay work is that we do our own ironing, cooking, cleaning and child minding as a response to the high price of these services.)
I don’t want to say that this is just a result of minimum wage laws. I was careful to note that in Australia the norm would be to pay more than the minimum and less than the minimum is common in the US. Whatever this is an extreme society and the results are - to my eyes - often peculiar. Lightly traded labor intensive goods and services are - at least to my eyes - startlingly cheap in America. And whilst laundry is my case example - the one I most enjoy is berries. Strawberries and raspberries are highly labor intensive fruit. Picking them is backbreaking and/or prickly work and they need to be transported to very tight timetables. Like laundry the cost in New York is about a third that in Sydney. And whilst clean clothes are nice - raspberries are wonderful. So a little self-consciously I literally enjoy the fruits of American inequality.
America was not always this unequal. Australia has got more unequal in my adult life. And inequality is not all bad - not only do I eat fine raspberries - but it makes some people more productive if there is a (financial) tree to climb. Its just - along with the side of the road Americans drive on and the endless adverts for medical services the most visible difference between Australia and America. I can’t help but be aware of it.
John
PS. Part II will be about traded and non-traded goods in the Eurozone. And the price of laundry...
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Hell is empty: A review of Bethany McLean and Joe Nocera on the financial crisis
Monday, November 15, 2010
China Media Express: A Wall Street drama
If you were six percent short at $8 - which some were - it was diabolical. At $20 you were down 9 percent of your fund. Moreover your position had increased by 2.5 times and your fund had reduced - so now the position would be over 16 percent of your fund. At that point the position is threatening the existence of your funds management business. After all it is now possible to lose 20 plus percent of your fund on a single obscure short. This is a major drama for someone...
John
Post script: For the avoidance of doubt the fund I know that was heavily short CCME was covering the whole way up. They are no longer heavily short CCME. They did however lose meaningful money.
They would have been only a small part of the volume. There are probably more than one party caught in this squeeze. Whether the squeeze is over? Who knows.
Correction: Several people have observed that the CFO is not sub 30 and not educated at an Australian university. I stand corrected. There is a young director of CCME who is also the financial controller of another listed company that fits that description. I wrote this from memory and confused my directors. The registered office of the company however is a serviced office in Hong Kong - the same serviced office as that young director operates out of.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Karratha property boom
I was criticized by some for cherry-picking my houses in the last Australian property post. I did not cherry pick houses – but chose ordinary houses in fashionable suburbs. I stated that clearly in the post. The criticism – if any – was that the suburbs were cherry-picked.
Now I am going cherry-picking. Karratha is a remote town in Western Australia – near the main port for loading iron-ore for its trip to China. It is also near the new ($12 billion) Pluto LNG development.
Land release is limited because the land is owned by the Ngarluma Aboriginal Corporation and this town – more than any other – is the epicenter of the Australian resource boom. I am just going to pick one house from www.realestate.com.au – but there are many others. This is a new house on the edge of suburbia - and you can have it for just over a million dollars.
You get a bathroom too –
This is in – as the Google map shows – a new development in the desert…
And just so you know there is no scarcity value to the real-estate I zoomed out a little:
There is increasing land release by the local aboriginal community.
But there is a bull case. You can probably rent this out for $1500 per week. And the iron-ore boom does not looking like stopping rapidly. However the construction phase of the Pluto project will stop by 2012 and local employment should fall a little then.
John
Friday, October 8, 2010
Universal Travel Group: the auditor resigns edition
On September 29th Universal Travel Group held a conference call to discuss their business model. They took no questions on the phone but instead answered a bunch of pre-prepared questions which included some but by no means all of the questions I asked on this blog.
In the call they specifically indicated that they had no problems with their auditor – but noted that their auditor had only been appointed recently and had not yet affirmed their accounts.
A week later, all that had changed. To quote from their press release:
On September 29, 2010, we received a letter dated September 28, 2010 from our current independent registered public accounting firm, Goldman Kurland Mohidin, LLP (“GKM”), informing us that they had resigned as our independent registered public accounting firm effective with the commencement of business on September 27, 2010. No reason was given as to the cause for their resignation. GKM was only recently appointed as our independent registered public accounting firm on September 1, 2010, and had not yet commenced providing any accounting services to us. Accordingly, GKM had not provided any opinions, qualification or modification to our financial statements for each of the past two fiscal years nor do we have any disagreements with GKM on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of GKM, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in its report on our financial statements for such periods.
And later in the same release:
Our Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approved the appointment of Windes & McClaughry Accountancy Corporation ("Windes") as our new independent registered public accounting firm effective as of September 30, 2010 and Windes has agreed to act as our new independent registered public accounting firm, subject to the Company clearing Windes’ client acceptance procedures.
Deriving a timeline is difficult here. If the company received the letter on the 29th was that before or after the conference call? If it were before the conference call (or if the company had any indication that the auditor was about to resign) then the statements made on the conference call were actively misleading. The call was held at 9am in New York on the 29th of September which is 9pm in Shenzen (where the company has its head office). It would be deeply problematic if the letter were received in business hours on the 29th at head office.
Also problematic is that they took a full week of trading days to report this to the SEC. I am not a US securities lawyer – so I do not know what the time-frame under which a company is required to report the resignation of an auditor – however – given what was said in the conference call the auditor resignation was market-sensitive – I think the default reporting requirement is rapid. (If someone is familiar with the legal requirements can they please detail in the comments.)
But this is not the first problem that Universal Travel has had with its auditors. The accounting industry publication Going Concern surprised me by going through all their filings for audit changes. I quote:
Auditors
First we went back to the 10-K filed on March 31, 2008 and discovered that on June 23, 2006, the company dismissed Moore & Associates, Chartered:
On June 23, 2006, we dismissed the firm of Moore & Associates, Chartered (“Former Auditor”), which had served as our independent auditor until that date. The Former Auditor was our auditor prior to the acquisition of control of our Company by Xiao Jun.
On June 23, 2006, we retained Morgenstern, Svoboda & Baer, CPA’s, P.C. to serve as our principal independent accountant.
This seemed to be a pretty good call on UTA’s part since it turned out that Moore & Associates was issuing bogus audit reports. No cause for concern at this point.
The relationship with Morgenstern, Svoboda & Baer appeared to be going on swimmingly but ultimately, for reasons unbeknownst to all, it didn’t work out. MS&B resigned on June 30, 2009 to make way for Acqavella, Chiarelli, Shuster, Berkower & Co., LLP:
On June 30, 2009, our prior independent registered public accounting firm, Morgenstern, Svoboda & Baer CPA (“Morgenstern”) resigned and on the same day, we appointed Acqavella, Chiarelli, Shuster, Berkower & Co., LLP (“ACSB”) as our new independent registered public accounting firm.
Similar to their predecessors, ACSB & Co. was humming along just fine, getting ratified in the recent preliminary proxy statement filing until they were up and fired on September 1st…
End quote. Going Concern continues through a total of five auditors and a smaller handful of CFOs and note that this run compares unfavorably to Overstock. I had no hand in this article and I encourage you to read the whole thing as a beautiful example of accounting due diligence.
But there are questions beyond audit. The conference call downplayed the importance of the websites indicating that about 80 percent of the business came through a traditional (and telephone based) travel agency. It also dismissed my staff-salary concerns by indicating that most the staff were taken on late in 2009 to staff their new 300 person phone center.
This left me puzzled. Somehow this company suddenly had enough extra business to staff a 300 person phone center – but the company had effectively zero marketing expense in 2009. How did potential customers suddenly know the phone number? How is it that anyone can open a phone center that large and without advertising get enough people to ring? There must be some really special marketing tricks here… I just wish the company would explain what they were…
Alas – they do not answer questions I send to them by email so I encourage speculation (especially informed speculation) in the comments. I thank my readers for that.
John Hempton
PS. This blog is having an effect. The 2007-dated “Easter eggs” on the www.cba-hotel.com site are being removed. For instance they have removed the link allowing you to purchase tickets to the 2007 Sinopec Formula 1 Grand Prix. They also removed (my as yet unreported) link to their “latest” air-flights mileage plan (a plan that was abolished when Lufthansa purchased Swiss Air in 2007).
General disclaimer
The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of Mr. Hempton. You should assume Mr. Hempton and his affiliates have positions in the securities discussed in this blog, and such beneficial ownership can create a conflict of interest regarding the objectivity of this blog. Statements in the blog are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors. Certain information in this blog concerning economic trends and performance is based on or derived from information provided by third-party sources. Mr. Hempton does not guarantee the accuracy of such information and has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information or the assumptions on which such information is based. Such information may change after it is posted and Mr. Hempton is not obligated to, and may not, update it. The commentary in this blog in no way constitutes a solicitation of business, an offer of a security or a solicitation to purchase a security, or investment advice. In fact, it should not be relied upon in making investment decisions, ever. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. In particular this blog is not directed for investment purposes at US Persons.