Reggie Middleton has done a fairly thorough analysis of GE. His picks as to the good bits and the bad bits is not dissimilar to mine. The worst bit is real estate - which he thinks deserves a big write-down.
None of the rest is seriously problematic - but he thinks it deserves low multiples. For some of that - fair enough. For other parts I think GE financial has some truly superior positions deserving of a higher than average multiple. But my disagreements here are minor.
He also puts relatively low multiples on the industrial bit - which he thinks grows but nothing like as much as I think.
In his uber-bearish way he gets GE being fair value now.
I think- and maybe I am just old fashioned - that the infrastructure bit of GE - which grows super-fast and has the most massive tailwind - is worth more than 5% market premium on the average American manufacturing company.
And if the blue-sky bits work (ESBWR reactors, Cameco JV, ultra light jet engines etc) then a 5% premium will seem very light.
And that is the extent of our disagreement.
If you are into GE I recommend reading Reggie's piece.
The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of Mr. Hempton. Mr. Hempton may hold either long or short positions in securities of various companies discussed in the blog based upon Mr. Hempton's recommendations. The commentary in this blog in no way constitutes a solicitation of business or investment advice. In fact, it should not be relied upon in making investment decisions, ever. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. In particular this blog is not directed for investment purposes at US Persons.