Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Canadian non-standard mortgages: a state of play

Regular readers of this blog will be aware that Home Capital Group - a Canadian non-standard mortgage lender - is in financial trouble.

The gossip is that the regulators in Canada are also putting some pressure on lenders to improve underwriting standards. There is similar gossip in Australia, however Australia has not had the collapse or near collapse of any lenders.

Canada Mortgage & Finance Group (CFMG) is a broker in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The CEO of CFMG (Ameera Ameerullah) writes a blog on LinkedIn which I have been reading for some time.

She has recently posted about the state of play for even slightly non-standard mortgages in the Greater Toronto Area.

Below (and without further comment but with her permission) I reprint her latest post.



Private lending rates increased and lending fees increased with LTV being decreased! Clients are stuck and brokers are scrambling to find options for their clients. Clients are placed in a very bad situation as they are in position of being sued since they cannot come up with the extra capital to close on alternative mortgages.

THE GOVERNMENT has caused tremendous issue for clients and the brokers community. We need Home trust back in the market. Presently no one is qualifying with the banks due to increased CMHC premium, lending restrictions and lenders requirement...it's killing clients not helping them!

Clients been saving for their down payment and closing cost but now they cannot close on their purchase due to down payment requirement and lending restrictions. Qualifying rate and amortization cut back on insured deals is causing greater concern. Most B lenders are affected with what's happening with Home Capital. Both the residential and commercial market is affected.

Private first residential mortgage in the GTA is now at 8.99 to 9.99% RATE - 65% LTV to 75% LTV. You'll obtain 80% if you're lucky and be prepared to pay higher rate and fees. Fees are 3 to 4% on a first now on private - This is INSANE. In fact many private lenders are out of capital. Options are minimum! These changes only affects clients and everyone having a tough time to close. Brokers are scrambling now to find alternative option for their clients since Home Trust is not funding and many other lenders who depended on Home trust money are stuck as well. How can a broker get by when they have to place their clients in an expensive private mortgage? There's no room for us to charge a fee so pretty much we are all affected. Only the big banks are benefiting from the Government change and yet they themselves are loosing business as no one can fit their qualifying requirements. Banks are pressuring their BDM to originate business - how can they when the Government ridiculous change affects the entire mortgage industry? Originating business is easy but closing deals have become horrid and clients pocket is feeling it.

The Government really need to make some immediate change as they have in the past year because with this trend home buyers are being placed in more debt as cost of borrowing on private capital is expensive. These changes are hurting clients and will hurt the economy. AWFUL STATE THE INDUSTRY IS IN. If one doesn't have about $1600 - they cannot live in a decent one bedroom apartment even by renting. Clients that purchased from builders and are set to close are having a difficult time to close in allocating extra funds.

Brokers should start to voice their opinion as this is our industry and if you don't speak up then we are all doomed with our clients!


Pat said...

Thanks for another interesting post, John.

I recently listened to a segment from the radio show This American Life about regulators at the NY Fed, which highlights the problems with the culture in some of these places. (The story includes secret recordings from a woman who was fired for essentially carrying out her assigned duties.) You can listen to it here:

It made me wonder about our regulators back here in Australia — it seems it really doesn't pay to rock the boat if you work at APRA or ASIC. The fact that interest-only loans have been allowed to grow to the extent they have is damning in itself, in my view.

Anonymous said...

It's surprising to this Canadian that any clients are stuck because they agreed to buy a house but now can't get financing. It used to be standard mortgage lender/broker advice to get pre-approved before making an offer on a property. It was when I was a buyer a decade ago. May be a sign of how loose the market has become.

Anonymous said...


Have you ever looked at Canadian Western Bank?

A lot of lending to residential homebuilders, and subprime mortgages, and a heavy loan concentration in Alberta which is in recession due to low oil prices.

Unknown said...

This is comical. This what happens when the is a complete lack of regulation or over site. Realtors and Brokers here in Canada have become the equivalent of a shady used car salesman. Now they are complaining that the government isn't doing enough to allow it to continue. Lol. Who drops a deposit and then goes to look for financing. Secondary lending practices here in Canada are a disaster and I would bet my paycheck that it is a serious problem with our big 6 banks also. 3 days ago I bought a car. $45k loan approved by the largest bank in Canada in less than 10 minutes with zero income verification. WTF. Great for me but if practices like that are running through the mortgage lending we are in serious trouble. We are almost 10 years past the implosion of housing in the US with values ballooning more than 50% since 2012. Canada is in for a world of hurt. People here use their houses like banks and seem to feel like values will go up forever. The timing may make it even worse if something happens with the amount of baby boomers at or coming up on retirement age expecting their house to pay for retirement. I think we are in for a wild ride in the next few years.

Unknown said...

John, do you understand the relationship between home capitals deposits and their liquidity. I've been watching the deposits for down everyday, but over the last few weeks liquidity has gone up.

Anonymous said...

Trouble taking this seriously when the english is so poorly written - fractured sentences, wanders on and off topic, struggles to make an argument.

It's written like some strange stream of consciousness explosion of stuff. And finally, "loosing" instead of "losing" really gets my goat.

I know I should look through for the message, however, my feeling is that if the author can't properly express themselves, then their business may be in all kinds of other mess too.

G. Sylvie Davies said...

Really interesting to contrast this with her June 1st 2017 blog post (on linkedin):

> On first mortgages, approximate rates are 3.75 to 4.99% and 9 to 11.99% on seconds ( depends on the overall deal). Lending fee depends on the deal but approximately 2.50% on a first and up to 4% on seconds. Again loan amount is up to 85% LTV.

Whereas in this June 8th post you've reposted here in your blog:

> Private first residential mortgage in the GTA [Greater Toronto Area] is now at 8.99 to 9.99% RATE - 65% LTV to 75% LTV. You'll obtain 80% if you're lucky and be prepared to pay higher rate and fees. Fees are 3 to 4% on a first now on private

G. Sylvie Davies said...

I'm astonished an insider would publish a blog post like that.

abee crombie said...

interesting post John

yes the private lending space is in a state of upheaval, but lets remember that this is for ppl who do not qualify under traditional underwriting. Do I really feel so bad for the guy who has 2 houses, 1.5M in mortgages (but also 1M in equity) but only 45K in verified income. These are the ppl using private lenders and their homes as piggy banks. He was playing with fire.

Anonymous said...

Berkshire to the rescue

Anonymous said...


General disclaimer

The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of Mr. Hempton. You should assume Mr. Hempton and his affiliates have positions in the securities discussed in this blog, and such beneficial ownership can create a conflict of interest regarding the objectivity of this blog. Statements in the blog are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors. Certain information in this blog concerning economic trends and performance is based on or derived from information provided by third-party sources. Mr. Hempton does not guarantee the accuracy of such information and has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information or the assumptions on which such information is based. Such information may change after it is posted and Mr. Hempton is not obligated to, and may not, update it. The commentary in this blog in no way constitutes a solicitation of business, an offer of a security or a solicitation to purchase a security, or investment advice. In fact, it should not be relied upon in making investment decisions, ever. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. In particular this blog is not directed for investment purposes at US Persons.