Thursday, March 5, 2009
Good behaviour and General Electric
General disclaimer
The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of Mr. Hempton. You should assume Mr. Hempton and his affiliates have positions in the securities discussed in this blog, and such beneficial ownership can create a conflict of interest regarding the objectivity of this blog. Statements in the blog are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors. Certain information in this blog concerning economic trends and performance is based on or derived from information provided by third-party sources. Mr. Hempton does not guarantee the accuracy of such information and has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information or the assumptions on which such information is based. Such information may change after it is posted and Mr. Hempton is not obligated to, and may not, update it. The commentary in this blog in no way constitutes a solicitation of business, an offer of a security or a solicitation to purchase a security, or investment advice. In fact, it should not be relied upon in making investment decisions, ever. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. In particular this blog is not directed for investment purposes at US Persons.
2 comments:
John,
it's the off-balance sheet derivatives that's worrying everyone.
GE may have to post additional collateral upon ratings cut.
Agree with you that the fundamentals don't warrant such a low stock price.
But it's a crisis of confidence at the moment.
mystery solved.
just saw jeff matthews on techticker, comparing with a sanctimonious face GE's ROC with MMM and HON.
and he's using the 600b on the balance sheet to calculate it!!!!!!
next up WFC and GOOG. what's the difference anyway.
Post a Comment